linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: add canaan k210 sram controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1f63684c-c549-a726-b046-1197ef94d540@microchip.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 16:04:55 +0000
From:   <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     <palmer@...osinc.com>, <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>, <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
CC:     <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>,
        <sam@...nborg.org>, <daniel@...ll.ch>, <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        <vkoul@...nel.org>, <airlied@...ux.ie>, <palmer@...belt.com>,
        <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <masahiroy@...nel.org>, <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        <niklas.cassel@....com>, <dillon.minfei@...il.com>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: add canaan k210
 sram controller

On 12/07/2022 16:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/07/2022 17:54, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com wrote:
>> On 11/07/2022 00:21, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> On 7/11/22 04:39, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com wrote:
>>>> Damien, Krzysztof,
>>>>
>>>> I know this particular version has not been posted for all that
>>>> long, but this binding is (functionally) unchanged for a few
>>>> versions now. Are you happy with this approach Damien?
>>>> U-Boot only cares about the compatible & the clocks property,
>>>> not the regs etc.
>>>>
>>>> I (lazily) tested it in U-Boot with the following diff:
>>>
>>> If both the kernel and u-boot still work as expected with this change, I
>>> am OK with it.
>>
>> It's all yours so Krzysztof :)
> 
> It's too late in the cycle for me to pick it up. If you have alternate
> tree to take it through, go ahead with:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> Otherwise, I'll take it after the merge window of v5.20, so in ~1 month
> according to crystal ball.


Cool, thanks Krzysztof. I know it is late in the game for v5.20.
Part of me is hoping that Palmer can take it with the dts patches,
going to bump all the outstanding & reviewed riscv dts patches when
I send my PR this weekend.

If not, I'll remind you in a month. Thanks,
Conor.