linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm64: bcmbca: Merge BCM4908 into BCMBCA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c40f20c7-59ee-99f4-9a11-e928b41eda9f@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 20:18:59 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>,
        Linux ARM List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:     kursad.oney@...adcom.com, anand.gore@...adcom.com,
        dan.beygelman@...adcom.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        Broadcom Kernel List <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        joel.peshkin@...adcom.com,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rafal@...ecki.pl
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm64: bcmbca: Merge BCM4908 into
 BCMBCA

On 12/07/2022 19:37, William Zhang wrote:
>>> +      - description: BCM4908 Family based boards
>>> +        items:
>>> +          - enum:
>>> +              # BCM4908 SoC based boards
>>> +              - brcm,bcm94908
>>> +              - asus,gt-ac5300
>>> +              - netgear,raxe500
>>> +              # BCM4906 SoC based boards
>>> +              - brcm,bcm94906
>>> +              - netgear,r8000p
>>> +              - tplink,archer-c2300-v1
>>> +          - enum:
>>> +              - brcm,bcm4908
>>> +              - brcm,bcm4906
>>> +              - brcm,bcm49408
>>
>> This is wrong.  brcm,bcm94908 followed by brcm,bcm4906 does not look
>> like valid list of compatibles.
>>
> For 4908 board variant, it will need to be followed by 4908 chip. Sorry 
> for the basic question but is there any requirement to enforce this kind 
> of rule?  I would assume dts writer know what he/she is doing and select 
> the right combination.

The entire point of DT schema is to validate DTS. Combination like above
prevents that goal.

Best regards,
Krzysztof