lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 20:20:44 +0200
From:   Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: UNTRAIN_RET in native_irq_return_ldt


Hi,

I think there is an issue in native_irq_return_ldt: UNTRAIN_RET is used and can
clobber %rax which is expected to be the user rax.

A simple fix would be to preserve %rax:

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
index a4ba162e52c3..f1fe05289d84 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -728,7 +728,11 @@ native_irq_return_ldt:
         pushq   %rdi                            /* Stash user RDI */
         swapgs                                  /* to kernel GS */
         SWITCH_TO_KERNEL_CR3 scratch_reg=%rdi   /* to kernel CR3 */
+
+       /* UNTRAIN_RET can clobber %rax, so preserve it */
+       movq    %rax, %rdi
         UNTRAIN_RET
+       movq    %rdi, %rax
  
         movq    PER_CPU_VAR(espfix_waddr), %rdi
         movq    %rax, (0*8)(%rdi)               /* user RAX */


But I wonder if we really need to use UNTRAIN_RET in native_irq_return_ldt because
I think we reach this point from the kernel after untrain has already be done,
and it looks like we don't do ret afterward (the code just fixup the stack and
then iret).

Thanks,

alex.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ