linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] thermal: intel: drop unexpected word 'is' in the comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 20:24:55 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Jiang Jian <jiangjian@...rlc.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: intel: drop unexpected word 'is' in the comments

On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 5:56 PM Jiang Jian <jiangjian@...rlc.com> wrote:
>
> there is an unexpected word 'is' in the comments that need to be dropped
>
> file: ./drivers/thermal/intel/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
> line: 108
>
> * tj-max is is interesting because threshold is set relative to this
>
> changed to:
>
> * tj-max is interesting because threshold is set relative to this
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Jian <jiangjian@...rlc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/intel/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
> index 4d8edc61a78b..a0e234fce71a 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static struct zone_device *pkg_temp_thermal_get_dev(unsigned int cpu)
>  }
>
>  /*
> -* tj-max is is interesting because threshold is set relative to this
> +* tj-max is interesting because threshold is set relative to this
>  * temperature.
>  */
>  static int get_tj_max(int cpu, u32 *tj_max)
> --

Applied as 5.20 material with some edits in the changelog and subject.

Thanks!