[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcQq3wmwmpaDtu6HC2yrK4rWp+4HOcqMaOHQ3EQQ0c=DA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 20:28:42 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] lib/find: add find_nth_bit()
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 6:26 PM Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 1:55 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 6:51 AM Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> wrote:
...
> > 2) fns() is not good abbreviation, because among ffs (First) and fls
> > (Last), fns would be read as Next, which is misleading, I'm not sure
> > fnths(), which is correct, is good for readers.
>
> I agree that fns() may be confusing, but fnths() is even worse to me.
I also think it's not the best choice.
> I expect that it will be mostly used indirectly via find_nth_bit(), and
> will not create a lot of confusion for users.
Perhaps in that case we can survive with something else? Naming is hard...
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists