linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop the "p is for pointer" from rmap helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 01:55:58 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop the "p is for pointer" from rmap helpers

Drop the trailing "p" from rmap helpers, i.e. rename functions to simply
be kvm_<action>_rmap().  Declaring that a function takes a pointer is
completely unnecessary and goes against kernel style.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 496672ffaf46..47e46c10731d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static u64 __update_clear_spte_slow(u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
  * The idea using the light way get the spte on x86_32 guest is from
  * gup_get_pte (mm/gup.c).
  *
- * An spte tlb flush may be pending, because kvm_set_pte_rmapp
+ * An spte tlb flush may be pending, because kvm_set_pte_rmap
  * coalesces them and we are running out of the MMU lock.  Therefore
  * we need to protect against in-progress updates of the spte.
  *
@@ -1396,9 +1396,9 @@ static bool kvm_zap_rmaps(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
 	return __kvm_zap_rmaps(kvm, rmap_head, slot);
 }
 
-static bool kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-			      struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-			      pte_t pte)
+static bool kvm_set_pte_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+			     struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
+			     pte_t pte)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
 	struct rmap_iterator iter;
@@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ bool kvm_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
 	bool flush = false;
 
 	if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
-		flush = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_set_pte_rmapp);
+		flush = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_set_pte_rmap);
 
 	if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm))
 		flush |= kvm_tdp_mmu_set_spte_gfn(kvm, range);
@@ -1550,9 +1550,9 @@ bool kvm_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
 	return flush;
 }
 
-static bool kvm_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-			  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-			  pte_t unused)
+static bool kvm_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+			 struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
+			 pte_t unused)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
 	struct rmap_iterator iter;
@@ -1564,9 +1564,9 @@ static bool kvm_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
 	return young;
 }
 
-static bool kvm_test_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-			       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
-			       int level, pte_t unused)
+static bool kvm_test_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+			      struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
+			      int level, pte_t unused)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
 	struct rmap_iterator iter;
@@ -1615,7 +1615,7 @@ bool kvm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
 	bool young = false;
 
 	if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
-		young = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_age_rmapp);
+		young = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_age_rmap);
 
 	if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm))
 		young |= kvm_tdp_mmu_age_gfn_range(kvm, range);
@@ -1628,7 +1628,7 @@ bool kvm_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
 	bool young = false;
 
 	if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
-		young = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_test_age_rmapp);
+		young = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_test_age_rmap);
 
 	if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm))
 		young |= kvm_tdp_mmu_test_age_gfn(kvm, range);
-- 
2.37.0.144.g8ac04bfd2-goog