lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:09:45 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc:     "linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "atomlin@...hat.com" <atomlin@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modules: move module symbols from init/Kconfig

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 05:57:35AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 11/07/2022 à 21:07, Luis Chamberlain a écrit :
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 06:33:08PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 11/07/2022 à 18:20, Luis Chamberlain a écrit :
> >>> This moves all the module symbols from init/Kconfig to its
> >>> own dedicated file now that we have all of the module code in
> >>> its own directory.
> >>>
> >>> This does not introduce any functional changes.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> >>
> >> It is similar to the patch I sent in February, isn't it ?
> >> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/patch/4042712961d42186c449734c253511ea7076c780.1645543105.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu/)
> > 
> > Sorry, I had missed that. Can you send a new v2 based on today's
> > modules-next? And I'll just drop my patch?
> > 
> 
> I sent out v2 rebased on today's modules-next 
> (c76654e22da1e0cb830bd0eb5832072fb76df358)
> 
> I see all my patches still have status 'new' in modules's patchwork 
> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/list/?submitter=192363).
> 
> Don't you maintain it ?

Yes but I never knew we used to have patchwork for modules, but glad we have
that now. Anyway all your patches are applied, is patchwork dumb to not
pick that up?

  Luis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ