linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] modules: move module symbols from init/Kconfig

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <09f3ec9a-3a8e-d116-d38a-2fdb55f125c6@csgroup.eu>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 05:57:35 +0000
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "atomlin@...hat.com" <atomlin@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modules: move module symbols from init/Kconfig



Le 11/07/2022 à 21:07, Luis Chamberlain a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 06:33:08PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 11/07/2022 à 18:20, Luis Chamberlain a écrit :
>>> This moves all the module symbols from init/Kconfig to its
>>> own dedicated file now that we have all of the module code in
>>> its own directory.
>>>
>>> This does not introduce any functional changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
>>
>> It is similar to the patch I sent in February, isn't it ?
>> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/patch/4042712961d42186c449734c253511ea7076c780.1645543105.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu/)
> 
> Sorry, I had missed that. Can you send a new v2 based on today's
> modules-next? And I'll just drop my patch?
> 

I sent out v2 rebased on today's modules-next 
(c76654e22da1e0cb830bd0eb5832072fb76df358)

I see all my patches still have status 'new' in modules's patchwork 
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/list/?submitter=192363).

Don't you maintain it ?

Thanks
Christophe