[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ys1sxRT0i/NXSui7@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:44:53 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ben Kao <ben.kao@...el.com>
Cc: mathias.nyman@...el.com, mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhci-pci: Enable runtime PM on Alder Lake-N PCH xHCI
controller
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 08:24:42PM +0800, Ben Kao wrote:
> There are two Alder Lake-N xHCI host controllers with PCI IDs
> 0x464e and 0x54ed, now we add the quirk to default enable runtime
> PM for 0x54ed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Kao <ben.kao@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> index dce6c0ec8d34..44486156bd5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ALDER_LAKE_XHCI 0x461e
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ALDER_LAKE_N_XHCI 0x464e
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ALDER_LAKE_PCH_XHCI 0x51ed
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ALDER_LAKE_N_PCH_XHCI 0x54ed
I think we ask this every time, but why don't we enable this for all
devices and then only disable it for the tiny number that don't need it?
Why do you all force us to add this for every new device created?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists