[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a51a0a2e-d50d-c172-9403-034b13dff1a4@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 23:02:48 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ke.wang@...soc.com, xuewyan@...mail.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/schedutil: Fix deadlock between cpuset and cpu
hotplug when using schedutil
On 7/11/22 17:11, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:58:28 -1000
> Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> I don't think lockdep would be able to track CPU1 -> CPU2 dependency here
>> unfortunately.
>>
>>> AFAIU:
>>>
>>>
>>> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2
>>>
>>> // attach task to a different
>>> // cpuset cgroup via sysfs
>>> __acquire(cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem)
>>>
>>> // pring up CPU2 online
>>> __acquire(cpu_hotplug_lock)
>>> // wait for CPU2 to come online
> Should there be some annotation here that tells lockdep that CPU1 is now
> blocked on CPU2?
>
> Then this case would be caught by lockdep.
>
> -- Steve
>
>
>>> // bringup cpu online
>>> // call cpufreq_online() which tries to create sugov kthread
>>> __acquire(cpu_hotplug_lock) copy_process()
>>> cgroup_can_fork()
>>> cgroup_css_set_fork()
>>> __acquire(cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem)
>>> // blocks forever // blocks forever // blocks forever
Actually, the dependency can probably be coded by calling
lockdep_acquire_cpus_lock() in cpu2 (task 2) before acquiring
cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem to indicate the dependency between CPU1 and
CPU2 (task 1 and task 2). lockdep_release_cpus_lock() can then called
after release the rwsem.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists