[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6bcd4c5-2311-451a-4792-6c2bc450b6@google.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 17:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm/tlb: ignore f->new_tlb_gen when zero
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, Nadav Amit wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2022, at 10:39 AM, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com> wrote:
> > On Jul 10, 2022, at 4:28 PM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:
> >> From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
> >>
> >> Commit aa44284960d5 ("x86/mm/tlb: Avoid reading mm_tlb_gen when
> >> possible") introduced an optimization of skipping the flush if the TLB
> >> generation that is flushed (as provided in flush_tlb_info) was already
> >> flushed.
> >
> > Dave,
> >
> > Can you please review this patch today?
> >
> > I feel bad (for a good reason) for breaking swap/migration.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nadav
>
> Ping?
>
> As you know, this really must go into 5.19 or otherwise aa44284960d5
> reverted.
No, aa44284960d5 is not in 5.19-rc: it's in linux-next heading for 5.20.
Hugh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists