[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO-hwJJPN=joJdQtfJ6qYxvkkgq3Ytp0yq6O=uUm4iCJCa47Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 14:32:13 +0200
From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>,
Joe Stringer <joe@...ium.io>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@...ux.intel.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 21/23] samples/bpf: add new hid_mouse example
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 2:16 PM Dominique Martinet
<asmadeus@...ewreck.org> wrote:
>
> Benjamin Tissoires wrote on Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 04:58:48PM +0200:
> > diff --git a/samples/bpf/hid_mouse.c b/samples/bpf/hid_mouse.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..f6e5f09026eb
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/samples/bpf/hid_mouse.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Benjamin Tissoires
> > + */
> > +
> > +/* not sure why but this doesn't get preoperly imported */
>
> typo: properly
>
> > +#define __must_check
>
> But more usefully, I don't think it should be needed -- we don't use
> __must_check at all in uapi includes; if this is needed that means some
> of the include here uses the kernel internal includes and that shouldn't
> be needed as they're not normally installed.
Indeed, I must have had the issue in the early days of development.
Removing the line still makes the program compile, so I'll remove it
in v7.
Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Benjamin
>
> Didn't actually try to see but taking the compilation line that fails
> and running it with -E will probably show where that must_check comes
> from
>
> --
> Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus,
> just passing by
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists