linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: regulator: add bindings for output-supply

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Jul 2022 08:23:39 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: regulator: add bindings for output-supply

On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 8:14 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 08:10:41AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 10:18:24AM +0200, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> > > Add a devicetree binding for the 9elements,output-supply driver.
>
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    enum:
> > > +      - 9elements,output-supply
>
> > Why does this have a vendor prefix when it appears to be a s/w
> > construct?
>
> It's a description of a power supply output from their system (system as
> a whole, not power provisioned within the system).

Well, that's a better commit message than the original, but I still
don't understand.

Rob