[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtArbh4a40cACRMt@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 15:42:54 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: regulator: add bindings for
output-supply
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 08:23:39AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 8:14 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > It's a description of a power supply output from their system (system as
> > a whole, not power provisioned within the system).
> Well, that's a better commit message than the original, but I still
> don't understand.
Consider for example a BMC (IIRC that's what their specific product is),
a bench supply or some automated test equipment. Part of the function
for these systems is to provide power to other systems which would be
represented as a root or wall supply in the description of the system
that actually uses the supply if it were described using DT.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists