[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32b30b60-26f7-50e9-7dca-c25bc3f4014d@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 08:50:02 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Lh Kuo 郭力豪 <lh.Kuo@...plus.com>,
Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911@...il.com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"amitk@...nel.org" <amitk@...nel.org>,
"rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] thermal: Add thermal driver for Sunplus
On 14/07/2022 07:32, Lh Kuo 郭力豪 wrote:
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int sunplus_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) {
>>> + struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> +
>>> + thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(&pdev->dev, sp_data->pcb_tz);
>>
>> You used devm to register, so this looks wrong and will lead to double free.
>>
>>
>
> You mean the remove function is not needed. ??
At least this call but after its removal the entire function would be
empty, I think.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists