[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220714095955epcms2p5f5e9a3123a368069b5c661cdeb70485e@epcms2p5>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:59:55 +0900
From: Wangseok Lee <wangseok.lee@...sung.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
CC: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jesper.nilsson@...s.com" <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
"lars.persson@...s.com" <lars.persson@...s.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"kw@...ux.com" <kw@...ux.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...s.com" <linux-arm-kernel@...s.com>,
"kernel@...s.com" <kernel@...s.com>,
Moon-Ki Jun <moonki.jun@...sung.com>,
Sang Min Kim <hypmean.kim@...sung.com>,
Dongjin Yang <dj76.yang@...sung.com>,
Yeeun Kim <yeeun119.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] phy: Add ARTPEC-8 PCIe PHY driver
On 07-07-22, 01:52, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 06-07-22, 17:10, Wangseok Lee wrote:
>> On 05-07-22, 15:30, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> > On 14-06-22, 10:34, Wangseok Lee wrote:
>> >> Add support Axis, ARTPEC-8 SoC.
>> >> ARTPEC-8 is the SoC platform of Axis Communications.
>> >> This is based on arm64 and support GEN4 & 2lane.
>> >> This driver provides PHY interface for ARTPEC-8 SoC PCIe controller,
>> >> based on Samsung PCIe PHY IP.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Wangseok Lee <wangseok.lee@...sung.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jaeho Cho <jaeho79.cho@...sung.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> v2->v3 :
>> >> -remove unnecessary indentation
>> >> -redefine local struct to statis const
>> >> -add static const to struct that requires static const definition
>> >> -remove wrappers on writel and readl
>> >>
>> >> v1->v2 :
>> >> -change folder name of phy driver to axis from artpec
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 1 +
>> >> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
>> >> drivers/phy/axis/Kconfig | 9 +
>> >> drivers/phy/axis/Makefile | 2 +
>> >> drivers/phy/axis/phy-artpec8-pcie.c | 776 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> 5 files changed, 789 insertions(+)
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/axis/Kconfig
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/axis/Makefile
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/axis/phy-artpec8-pcie.c
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> >> index 300b0f2..92b8232 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> >> +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> >> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ config PHY_CAN_TRANSCEIVER
>> >>
>> >> source "drivers/phy/allwinner/Kconfig"
>> >> source "drivers/phy/amlogic/Kconfig"
>> >> +source "drivers/phy/axis/Kconfig"
>> >> source "drivers/phy/broadcom/Kconfig"
>> >> source "drivers/phy/cadence/Kconfig"
>> >> source "drivers/phy/freescale/Kconfig"
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> >> index 01e9eff..808c055e 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> >> +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> >> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_PISTACHIO_USB) += phy-pistachio-usb.o
>> >> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_LGM_PHY) += phy-lgm-usb.o
>> >> obj-y += allwinner/ \
>> >> amlogic/ \
>> >> + axis/ \
>> >> broadcom/ \
>> >> cadence/ \
>> >> freescale/ \
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/phy/axis/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/axis/Kconfig
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 0000000..7198b93
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/drivers/phy/axis/Kconfig
>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>> >> +config PHY_ARTPEC8_PCIE
>> >> + bool "ARTPEC-8 PCIe PHY driver"
>> >> + depends on OF && (ARCH_ARTPEC8 || COMPILE_TEST)
>> >> + select GENERIC_PHY
>> >> + help
>> >> + Enable PCIe PHY support for ARTPEC-8 SoC.
>> >> + This driver provides PHY interface for ARTPEC-8 SoC
>> >> + PCIe controller.
>> >> + This is based on Samsung PCIe PHY IP.
>> >
>> > How different is it from SS IP and why should it not be under
>> > phy/samsung/ then?
>> >
>>
>> SoC platform is completely different from exynos platform and different
>> from exynos PCIe PHY. So the overall sysreg configuration is different
>> and register map is also different. The reset method and type of PHY for
>> initialization are different. This is not a driver that supports Samsung
>> SoC platform, but this PHY driver that supports only Axis, Artpec-8
>> platforms, so it is not added to phy/samsung.
>
> SoC is a moot point. If the IP block is same then we should try to reuse
> the existing phy driver, modifications to current driver to support your
> changes should be fine...
>
> Is that feasible?
>
> --
> ~Vinod
Sorry for late reply.
Above all, the IP blocks of phy-exynos-pcie.c and artpec8's pcie phy are
different. As a result, the H/W architecture and operation sequence is
very different. So it is very difficult to merge into a exynos pcie file.
If possible, we would like to proceed with a new file. Is that possible?
Best regards,
Wangseok Lee
Powered by blists - more mailing lists