[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220714220354.795c8992@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 22:03:54 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: dsa: qca8k: move driver to qca dir
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 22:53:50 +0200 Christian Marangi wrote:
> This is a start for the required changes for code
> split. Greg wasn't so negative about this kind of change
> so I think we can finally make the move.
>
> Still waiting some comments about the code split.
> (Can I split qca8k to common function that will be
> used by ipq4019? (and later propose the actual
> ipq4019 driver?))
Does the split mean that this code will move again?
If so perhaps better to put this patch in the series
that does the split? We're ~2 weeks away from the merge
window so we don't want to end up moving the same code
twice in two consecutive releases.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists