[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <612025e7-106d-683a-8ea4-5edc019ceeb0@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 10:46:56 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] drm: A couple of fixes for drm_copy_field() helper
function
On 7/5/22 12:02, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Peter Robinson reported me a kernel bug in one of his aarch64 test boards
> and even though I was not able to reproduce it, I think that figured out
> what the problem was. It seems the cause is that a DRM driver doesn't set
> some of the struct drm fields copied to userspace via DRM_IOCTL_VERSION.
>
> Even though this is a driver bug, we can make drm_copy_field() more robust
> and warn about it instead of leading to an attempt to copy a NULL pointer.
>
> While looking at this, I also found that a variable in drm_copy_field() is
> not using the correct type. So I included that change in the patch-set too.
>
Pushed these to drm-misc (drm-misc-next). Thanks!
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists