lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:47:27 +0100 From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> To: rafael@...nel.org Cc: viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Move max CPU capacity to sugov_policy Hi Rafael, gentle ping. On 7/11/22 13:42, Lukasz Luba wrote: > There is no need to keep the max CPU capacity in the per_cpu instance. > Furthermore, there is no need to check and update that variable > (sg_cpu->max) everytime in the frequency change request, which is part > of hot path. Instead use struct sugov_policy to store that information. > Initialize the max CPU capacity during the setup and start callback. > We can do that since all CPUs in the same frequency domain have the same > max capacity (capacity setup and thermal pressure are based on that). > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> > --- > kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) The patch got Ack from Viresh. Could you take it? Regards, Lukasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists