[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220715154444.GA17123@blackbody.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:44:44 +0200
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, asml.silence@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fam.zheng@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] io_uring: remove ring quiesce for
io_uring_register
Hello.
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 02:51:17PM +0000, Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com> wrote:
> - percpu_ref_resurrect(ref);
> [...]
> - percpu_ref_reinit(&ctx->refs);
It seems to me that this patch could have also changed
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1911,7 +1911,7 @@ static __cold struct io_ring_ctx *io_ring_ctx_alloc(struct io_uring_params *p)
ctx->dummy_ubuf->ubuf = -1UL;
if (percpu_ref_init(&ctx->refs, io_ring_ctx_ref_free,
- PERCPU_REF_ALLOW_REINIT, GFP_KERNEL))
+ 0, GFP_KERNEL))
goto err;
ctx->flags = p->flags;
Or are there any plans to still use the reinit/resurrect functionality
of the percpu counter?
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists