[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a9adb78-d9bb-a511-e4c1-c94cca392c9b@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 10:00:17 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, asml.silence@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fam.zheng@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] io_uring: remove ring quiesce for
io_uring_register
On 7/15/22 9:44 AM, Michal Koutn? wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 02:51:17PM +0000, Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com> wrote:
>> - percpu_ref_resurrect(ref);
>> [...]
>> - percpu_ref_reinit(&ctx->refs);
>
> It seems to me that this patch could have also changed
>
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -1911,7 +1911,7 @@ static __cold struct io_ring_ctx *io_ring_ctx_alloc(struct io_uring_params *p)
> ctx->dummy_ubuf->ubuf = -1UL;
>
> if (percpu_ref_init(&ctx->refs, io_ring_ctx_ref_free,
> - PERCPU_REF_ALLOW_REINIT, GFP_KERNEL))
> + 0, GFP_KERNEL))
> goto err;
>
> ctx->flags = p->flags;
>
> Or are there any plans to still use the reinit/resurrect functionality
> of the percpu counter?
Ah yes indeed, good catch! Would you mind sending that as an actual
patch?
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists