linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Jul 2022 09:44:53 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc:     Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the
 drm-misc-fixes tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:05:45 +0200 Christian König <christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
>
> Am 11.07.22 um 04:47 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> >    925b6e59138c ("Revert "drm/amdgpu: add drm buddy support to amdgpu"")
> >
> > from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commit:
> >
> >    5e3f1e7729ec ("drm/amdgpu: fix start calculation in amdgpu_vram_mgr_new")
> >
> > from the drm tree.
> >
> > This is a mess :-(  I have just reverted the above revert before mergin
> > the drm tree for today, please fix it up.  
> 
> Sorry for the noise, the patch "5e3f1e7729ec ("drm/amdgpu: fix start
> calculation in amdgpu_vram_mgr_new")" and another one is going to be
> reverted from the drm tree as well.
> 
> It's just that -fixes patches where faster than -next patches.

Here we are a week later, -rc7 has been released and as far as I can
tell (though I may have missed it), this is still a problem :-(

I am still reverting 925b6e59138c (which is now in Linus' tree).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped