lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWzBy0O0kQTZxC52oL7At2EcFpL0C3nY4YAsBPzaEGW=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:35:34 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree

Hi Stephen,

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 1:49 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:05:45 +0200 Christian König <christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
> > Am 11.07.22 um 04:47 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
> > >
> > >    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
> > >
> > > between commit:
> > >
> > >    925b6e59138c ("Revert "drm/amdgpu: add drm buddy support to amdgpu"")
> > >
> > > from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commit:
> > >
> > >    5e3f1e7729ec ("drm/amdgpu: fix start calculation in amdgpu_vram_mgr_new")
> > >
> > > from the drm tree.
> > >
> > > This is a mess :-(  I have just reverted the above revert before mergin
> > > the drm tree for today, please fix it up.
> >
> > Sorry for the noise, the patch "5e3f1e7729ec ("drm/amdgpu: fix start
> > calculation in amdgpu_vram_mgr_new")" and another one is going to be
> > reverted from the drm tree as well.
> >
> > It's just that -fixes patches where faster than -next patches.
>
> Here we are a week later, -rc7 has been released and as far as I can
> tell (though I may have missed it), this is still a problem :-(
>
> I am still reverting 925b6e59138c (which is now in Linus' tree).

Thanks for the hint! After reverting that commit, drm-next (sort of[1])
merges cleanly into upstream again.

[1] There's still a small conflict due to the removal of
    force_dpms_off, cfr. the difference between commits
    3283c83eb6fcfbda and cc79950bf0904f58 ("drm/amd/display:
    Ensure valid event timestamp for cursor-only commits") in
    v5.19-rc7 resp. drm-next.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ