[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0275eb0c-1311-2b3b-1e37-d5297ba1a443@seco.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:40:45 -0400
From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 08/47] net: phylink: Support differing link
speeds and interface speeds
On 7/18/22 1:28 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > I am rather worried that we have drivers using ->speed today in their
>> > mac_config and we're redefining what that means in this patch.
>>
>> Well, kind of. Previously, interface speed was defined to be link speed,
>> and both were just "speed". The MAC driver doesn't really care what the
>> link speed is if there is a phy, just how fast the phy interface mode
>> speed is.
>
> I'm not sure that is true. At least for SGMII, the MAC is passed the
> line side speed, which can be 10, 100, or 1G. The PHY interface mode
> speed is fixed at 1G, since it is SGMII, but the MAC needs to know if
> it needs to repeat symbols because the line side speed is lower than
> the host side speed.
Right. In this case the phy interface speed is changing, so the MAC
needs to know about it. I suppose a more precise definition would be
something like
> The data rate of the media-independent interface between the MAC and
> the phy, without taking into account protocol overhead or flow control,
> but including encoding overhead.
as opposed to the link speed which is
> The data rate of the medium between the local device and the link
> partner, without ...
--Sean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists