[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC_TJvcNEJerTnnCWpKhEuuzpa6LypW2CLb-zbsCk6Nu59_e=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 10:40:47 -0700
From: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
andreyknvl@...il.com, vincenzo.frascino@....com,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Keir Fraser <keirf@...gle.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>,
"moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
kvmarm <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, android-mm@...gle.com,
"Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/18] arm64: stacktrace: Handle frame pointer from
different address spaces
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 6:57 AM 'Fuad Tabba' via kernel-team
<kernel-team@...roid.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Kalesh,
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 7:11 AM 'Kalesh Singh' via kernel-team
> <kernel-team@...roid.com> wrote:
> >
> > The unwinder code is made reusable so that it can be used to
> > unwind various types of stacks. One usecase is unwinding the
> > nVHE hyp stack from the host (EL1) in non-protected mode. This
> > means that the unwinder must be able to tracnslate HYP stack
>
> s/tracnslate/translate
>
> > addresses to kernel addresses.
> >
> > Add a callback (stack_trace_translate_fp_fn) to allow specifying
> > the translation function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
> > index 0c5cbfdb56b5..5f5d74a286f3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
> > @@ -123,9 +123,22 @@ static inline void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
> > state->prev_fp = 0;
> > state->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
> > }
> > +/**
> > + * stack_trace_translate_fp_fn() - Translates a non-kernel frame pointer to
> > + * a kernel address.
> > + *
> > + * @fp: the frame pointer to be updated to it's kernel address.
> > + * @type: the stack type associated with frame pointer @fp
> > + *
> > + * Returns true and success and @fp is updated to the corresponding
> > + * kernel virtual address; otherwise returns false.
> > + */
>
> Please add a newline before the new block.
>
> Also, something which you have done in comment blocks in this patch as
> well as future patches (so I won't mention them again) is use the
> opening comment mark /** , which is meant for kernel-doc comments
> (https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html).
> However, this block, and many if not most of the others don't seem to
> be conformant (scripts/kernel-doc -v -none
> arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h).
>
> I think the easiest thing to do is to format them as a normal block: /*.
>
>
> > +typedef bool (*stack_trace_translate_fp_fn)(unsigned long *fp,
> > + enum stack_type type);
> >
> > static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
> > - struct stack_info *info)
> > + struct stack_info *info,
> > + stack_trace_translate_fp_fn translate_fp)
> > {
> > struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
> > unsigned long fp = state->fp;
> > @@ -159,13 +172,22 @@ static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
> > __set_bit(state->prev_type, state->stacks_done);
> > }
> >
> > + /* Record fp as prev_fp before attempting to get the next fp */
> > + state->prev_fp = fp;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If fp is not from the current address space perform the necessary
> > + * translation before dereferencing it to get the next fp.
> > + */
> > + if (translate_fp && !translate_fp(&fp, info->type))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
>
> A call to unwind_next_common could fail having updated state->prev_fp
> as well as state->stacks_done. I think that it might be better to
> rework it so that there aren't any side effects should a call fail.
Hi Fuad,
Thanks for the comments. I'll address them in the next version.
--Kalesh
>
> Thanks,
> /fuad
>
>
>
>
>
> > /*
> > * Record this frame record's values and location. The prev_fp and
> > * prev_type are only meaningful to the next unwind_next() invocation.
> > */
> > state->fp = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
> > state->pc = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
> > - state->prev_fp = fp;
> > state->prev_type = info->type;
> >
> > return 0;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> > index 834851939364..eef3cf6bf2d7 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
> > if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
> > return -ENOENT;
> >
> > - err = unwind_next_common(state, &info);
> > + err = unwind_next_common(state, &info, NULL);
> > if (err)
> > return err;
> >
> > --
> > 2.37.0.170.g444d1eabd0-goog
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@...roid.com.
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@...roid.com.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists