[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtXyNGHKEd9mtkSF@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 01:52:20 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Johannes Wikner <kwikner@...z.ch>,
Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@...ux.intel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Joao Moreira <joao.moreira@...el.com>,
Joseph Nuzman <joseph.nuzman@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/38] x86/retbleed: Call depth tracking mitigation
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 03:34:51PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I think the main cause is that the ACPI code builds with
>
> ccflags-y := -Os -D_LINUX -DBUILDING_ACPICA
>
> and that '-Os' will disable all function alignment. I think there's a
> few other places that do that too.
Urgh, that's -Ostupid, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists