[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFp30G=x-LmiG+1NFsKaDTZvBU8bfgr9eUsMHiD4Jymotw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:37:48 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@...rlc.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc/core: fix repeated words in comments
On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 at 16:04, Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@...rlc.com> wrote:
>
> Delete the redundant word 'it'.
> Delete the redundant word 'in'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@...rlc.com>
I am fine with picking up patches that fixes spelling mistakes.
However, I would rather see that you go through all spelling mistakes
in the core and send one patch for all of them. It gets easier for me
to manage it in this way.
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index 4b70cbfc6d5d..e4a555a2f202 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static const unsigned freqs[] = { 400000, 300000, 200000, 100000 };
> /*
> * Enabling software CRCs on the data blocks can be a significant (30%)
> * performance cost, and for other reasons may not always be desired.
> - * So we allow it it to be disabled.
> + * So we allow it to be disabled.
> */
> bool use_spi_crc = 1;
> module_param(use_spi_crc, bool, 0);
> @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_cqe_post_req);
> * @host: MMC host to recover
> *
> * Recovery consists of stopping CQE, stopping eMMC, discarding the queue in
> - * in eMMC, and discarding the queue in CQE. CQE must call
> + * eMMC, and discarding the queue in CQE. CQE must call
> * mmc_cqe_request_done() on all requests. An error is returned if the eMMC
> * fails to discard its queue.
> */
> --
> 2.36.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists