[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220716041951.34714-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 12:19:51 +0800
From: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
To: linux@...ck-us.net
Cc: wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: dw_wdt: Fix comment typo
The double `have' is duplicated in the comment, remove one.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
---
drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
index cd578843277e..3208ce305335 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int dw_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd, unsigned int top_s)
/*
* Set the new value in the watchdog. Some versions of dw_wdt
- * have have TOPINIT in the TIMEOUT_RANGE register (as per
+ * have TOPINIT in the TIMEOUT_RANGE register (as per
* CP_WDT_DUAL_TOP in WDT_COMP_PARAMS_1). On those we
* effectively get a pat of the watchdog right here.
*/
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists