[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <231de7ae-a7b0-14f0-6778-91ad9cf4223f@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 08:11:26 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
Cc: wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: dw_wdt: Fix comment typo
On 7/15/22 21:19, Jason Wang wrote:
> The double `have' is duplicated in the comment, remove one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> index cd578843277e..3208ce305335 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int dw_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd, unsigned int top_s)
>
> /*
> * Set the new value in the watchdog. Some versions of dw_wdt
> - * have have TOPINIT in the TIMEOUT_RANGE register (as per
> + * have TOPINIT in the TIMEOUT_RANGE register (as per
> * CP_WDT_DUAL_TOP in WDT_COMP_PARAMS_1). On those we
> * effectively get a pat of the watchdog right here.
> */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists