linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v3] block: don't allow the same type rq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <17df93c3-5d12-aea9-95df-a46437ea798a@bytedance.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 01:12:06 +0800
From:   hanjinke <hanjinke.666@...edance.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, tj@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v3] block: don't allow the same type rq_qos
 add more than once

okay, I will do it.

在 2022/7/20 上午12:56, Jens Axboe 写道:
> On 7/19/22 10:53 AM, Jinke Han wrote:
>> From: Jinke Han <hanjinke.666@...edance.com>
>>
>> In our test of iocost, we encounttered some list add/del corrutions of
>> inner_walk list in ioc_timer_fn.
> 
> This still fails for 5.20 and you didn't correct any of the spelling
> mistakes I identified.
> 
> Please take your time to get this right rather than attempt to rush it
> and needing to send new versions all of the time.
>