[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1019b931-4d0d-ecea-c170-29e3899acd9b@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:36:18 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
acme@...nel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
leo.yan@...aro.org, quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] coresight: trace-id: update CoreSight core to
use Trace ID API
Hi Mike
On 04/07/2022 09:11, Mike Leach wrote:
> Initialises the default trace ID map.
>
> This will be used by all source drivers to be allocated their trace IDs.
As per previous patch, we may not need an explicit call from here.
>
> The checks for sources to have unique IDs has been removed - this is now
> guaranteed by the ID allocation mechanisms, and inappropriate where
> multiple ID maps are in use in larger systems
>
And this looks like a candidate for a separate patch, as the sources do
not use the new API yet ? Once they do, in the following patches, we
could remove this code.
All said, this patch could be renamed and moved to the bottom of the
series, with :
"coresight: Remove obsolete trace-id uniqueness checks"
Otherwise, looks good to me.
> Signed-off-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c | 49 ++------------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> index 1edfec1e9d18..be69e05fde1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include "coresight-etm-perf.h"
> #include "coresight-priv.h"
> #include "coresight-syscfg.h"
> +#include "coresight-trace-id.h"
>
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(coresight_mutex);
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct coresight_device *, csdev_sink);
> @@ -84,45 +85,6 @@ struct coresight_device *coresight_get_percpu_sink(int cpu)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(coresight_get_percpu_sink);
>
> -static int coresight_id_match(struct device *dev, void *data)
> -{
> - int trace_id, i_trace_id;
> - struct coresight_device *csdev, *i_csdev;
> -
> - csdev = data;
> - i_csdev = to_coresight_device(dev);
> -
> - /*
> - * No need to care about oneself and components that are not
> - * sources or not enabled
> - */
> - if (i_csdev == csdev || !i_csdev->enable ||
> - i_csdev->type != CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SOURCE)
> - return 0;
> -
> - /* Get the source ID for both components */
> - trace_id = source_ops(csdev)->trace_id(csdev);
> - i_trace_id = source_ops(i_csdev)->trace_id(i_csdev);
> -
> - /* All you need is one */
> - if (trace_id == i_trace_id)
> - return 1;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int coresight_source_is_unique(struct coresight_device *csdev)
> -{
> - int trace_id = source_ops(csdev)->trace_id(csdev);
> -
> - /* this shouldn't happen */
> - if (trace_id < 0)
> - return 0;
> -
> - return !bus_for_each_dev(&coresight_bustype, NULL,
> - csdev, coresight_id_match);
> -}
> -
> static int coresight_find_link_inport(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> struct coresight_device *parent)
> {
> @@ -431,12 +393,6 @@ static int coresight_enable_source(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (!coresight_source_is_unique(csdev)) {
> - dev_warn(&csdev->dev, "traceID %d not unique\n",
> - source_ops(csdev)->trace_id(csdev));
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> if (!csdev->enable) {
> if (source_ops(csdev)->enable) {
> ret = coresight_control_assoc_ectdev(csdev, true);
> @@ -1775,6 +1731,9 @@ static int __init coresight_init(void)
> if (ret)
> goto exit_bus_unregister;
>
> + /* initialise the default trace ID map */
> + coresight_trace_id_init_default_map();
> +
> /* initialise the coresight syscfg API */
> ret = cscfg_init();
> if (!ret)
Suzuki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists