linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 -next 2/2] irqdomain: Replace revmap_direct_max_irq field with hwirq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220719063641.56541-3-xuqiang36@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 06:36:41 +0000
From:   Xu Qiang <xuqiang36@...wei.com>
To:     <maz@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xuqiang36@...wei.com>,
        <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>, <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 -next 2/2] irqdomain: Replace revmap_direct_max_irq field with hwirq_max field

In commit "4f86a06e2d6e irqdomain: Make normal and nomap irqdomains exclusive",
use revmap_size field instead of revmap_direct_max_irq. revmap_size field
originally indicates the maximum hwirq of linear Mapping. This results in
revmap_size having two different layers of meaning that can be confusing.

This patch optimization point is to solve this confusion point. During
direct mapping, the values of hwirq_max and revmap_direct_max_irq are the same
and have the same meanings. They both indicate the maximum hwirq supported by
direct Mapping. The optimization method is to delete revmap_direct_max_irq
field and use hwirq_max instead of revmap_direct_max_irq.

Signed-off-by: Xu Qiang <xuqiang36@...wei.com>
---
 kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
index 481abb885d61..8fe1da9614ee 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
@@ -147,7 +147,8 @@ struct irq_domain *__irq_domain_add(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, unsigned int s
 	static atomic_t unknown_domains;
 
 	if (WARN_ON((size && direct_max) ||
-		    (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_NOMAP) && direct_max)))
+		    (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_NOMAP) && direct_max) ||
+		    (direct_max && (direct_max != hwirq_max))))
 		return NULL;
 
 	domain = kzalloc_node(struct_size(domain, revmap, size),
@@ -219,7 +220,6 @@ struct irq_domain *__irq_domain_add(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, unsigned int s
 	domain->hwirq_max = hwirq_max;
 
 	if (direct_max) {
-		size = direct_max;
 		domain->flags |= IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_NO_MAP;
 	}
 
@@ -650,9 +650,9 @@ unsigned int irq_create_direct_mapping(struct irq_domain *domain)
 		pr_debug("create_direct virq allocation failed\n");
 		return 0;
 	}
-	if (virq >= domain->revmap_size) {
-		pr_err("ERROR: no free irqs available below %i maximum\n",
-			domain->revmap_size);
+	if (virq >= domain->hwirq_max) {
+		pr_err("ERROR: no free irqs available below %lu maximum\n",
+			domain->hwirq_max);
 		irq_free_desc(virq);
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ struct irq_desc *__irq_resolve_mapping(struct irq_domain *domain,
 		return desc;
 
 	if (irq_domain_is_nomap(domain)) {
-		if (hwirq < domain->revmap_size) {
+		if (hwirq < domain->hwirq_max) {
 			data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, hwirq);
 			if (data && data->hwirq == hwirq)
 				desc = irq_data_to_desc(data);
-- 
2.17.1