[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6d75b81cdba4a244b142e2f8bb65d71@overdrivepizza.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 17:19:13 -0700
From: Joao Moreira <joao@...rdrivepizza.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
"Cooper, Andrew" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Johannes Wikner <kwikner@...z.ch>,
Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@...ux.intel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
"Moreira, Joao" <joao.moreira@...el.com>,
"Nuzman, Joseph" <joseph.nuzman@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Gross, Jurgen" <jgross@...e.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/38] x86/retbleed: Call depth tracking mitigation
> The extra instruction is likely less of a problem than the extra
> register used.
>
FWIIW, per-ABI, R11 is a scratch-reg and should be usable without hard
consequences in this scenario.
Joao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists