linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] vsock: use sk_skrcvlowat to set POLLIN,POLLRDNORM, bits.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8a8aa9e8-cc8f-41a6-504d-163a73231788@sberdevices.ru>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 05:35:20 +0000
From:   Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
To:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
CC:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] vsock: use sk_skrcvlowat to set
 POLLIN,POLLRDNORM, bits.

On 19.07.2022 15:44, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 08:15:42AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> Both bits indicate, that next data read call won't be blocked,
>> but when sk_rcvlowat is not 1,these bits will be set by poll
>> anyway,thus when user tries to dequeue data, it will wait until
>> sk_rcvlowat bytes of data will be available.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
>> ---
>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> index f04abf662ec6..0225f3558e30 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> @@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ static __poll_t vsock_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
>>             !(sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)) {
>>             bool data_ready_now = false;
>>             int ret = transport->notify_poll_in(
>> -                    vsk, 1, &data_ready_now);
>> +                    vsk, sk->sk_rcvlowat, &data_ready_now);
> 
> In tcp_poll() we have the following:
>     int target = sock_rcvlowat(sk, 0, INT_MAX);
> 
> Maybe we can do the same here.

You are right, ack

> 
> Thanks,
> Stefano
> 
>>             if (ret < 0) {
>>                 mask |= EPOLLERR;
>>             } else {
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>