linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] virtio/vsock: use 'target' in notify_poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <15f38fcf-f1ff-3aad-4c30-4436bb8c4c44@sberdevices.ru>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 05:38:03 +0000
From:   Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
To:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
CC:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] virtio/vsock: use 'target' in notify_poll_in,
 callback.

On 19.07.2022 15:48, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 08:17:31AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> This callback controls setting of POLLIN,POLLRDNORM output bits
>> of poll() syscall,but in some cases,it is incorrectly to set it,
>> when socket has at least 1 bytes of available data. Use 'target'
>> which is already exists and equal to sk_rcvlowat in this case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
>> ---
>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> index ec2c2afbf0d0..591908740992 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ virtio_transport_notify_poll_in(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>>                 size_t target,
>>                 bool *data_ready_now)
>> {
>> -    if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk))
>> +    if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) >= target)
>>         *data_ready_now = true;
>>     else
>>         *data_ready_now = false;
> 
> Perhaps we can take the opportunity to clean up the code in this way:
> 
>     *data_ready_now = vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) >= target;
Ack
> 
> Anyway, I think we also need to fix the other transports (vmci and hyperv), what do you think?
For vmci it is look clear to fix it. For hyperv i need to check it more, because it already
uses some internal target value.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>