[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e3bfcb2-41e8-5e67-6e17-8dc1a0dd0c07@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:29:37 -0700
From: William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>
To: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Cc: Linux ARM List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
joel.peshkin@...adcom.com, dan.beygelman@...adcom.com,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Anand Gore <anand.gore@...adcom.com>,
Kursad Oney <kursad.oney@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 5/9] arm64: dts: Add BCM4908 generic board dts
On 07/20/2022 11:45 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 2022-07-21 02:07, William Zhang wrote:
>> Add generic bcm94908.dts file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>
>> ---
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcmbca/Makefile | 1 +
>> .../boot/dts/broadcom/bcmbca/bcm94908.dts | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcmbca/bcm94908.dts
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcmbca/Makefile
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcmbca/Makefile
>> index d30fa75f0611..27741b71ba9e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcmbca/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcmbca/Makefile
>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCMBCA) += \
>> bcm4906-tplink-archer-c2300-v1.dtb \
>> bcm4908-asus-gt-ac5300.dtb \
>> bcm4908-netgear-raxe500.dtb \
>> + bcm94908.dtb \
>> bcm4912-asus-gt-ax6000.dtb \
>> bcm94912.dtb \
>> bcm963158.dtb \
>
> AFAIU bcm94908 is a reference board name. I think I see some
> inconsistency in naming Broadcom's reference boards DTS files.
>
> If you take a look at in-kernel DTS files:
> find ./arch/arm*/boot/dts/ -name "*.dts"
> 99% of them are prefixed with family/SoC name. I did the same for
> bcm4908 (and Northstar) boards. So it's
> <soc>-<manufacturer>-<model>.dts
> e.g.
> bcm4908-asus-gt-ac5300.dts
>
> To match that I *think* you should actually call your file:
> bcm4908-bcm94908 (or bcm4908-94908 depending on actual board name)
>
> First of all: am I correct here?
>
I do see many dts named in the format you described here and I agree it
is very clear. But at Broadcom we use a slight different format for
reference boards that we started from day 1: bcm9<soc>-<ref board
model>.dts such as bcm963138REF.dts. And there are many in the kernel as
well if you search "bcm9*.dts". Many of them are Broadcom reference
boards and some are actual consumer product.
> Secondly: could you do that? I know many DTS files named ignoring SoC/
> family prefix. Still maybe we could change it as some (this) point?
I actually was thinking to ask you if we can change all the 4908 boards
to use bcm94908- prefix to be consistent with Broadcom board name
convention. But at the second thought, I didn't ask because it does not
make much benefit other than a uniform name, unless you agree and I can
make that change. Otherwise, I would rather keep them as they are now
because we have ton of reference boards here and we don't want to make
that changes to remove the 9 (which will definitive cause big confusing
internally) and there are no rule in linux for the name as far as I
know. What I can do is update the bcmbca.yaml to put bcmbca board name
rule bcm9<soc>-<ref board model>.dts for broadcom reference board and
bcm<soc>-<manufacturer>-<model>.dts for customer board, if that sounds
good to you.
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4212 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists