[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a635754e-bf41-4058-5fbb-57ead36b7128@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 08:44:18 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>,
Linux ARM List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc: joel.peshkin@...adcom.com, dan.beygelman@...adcom.com,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Anand Gore <anand.gore@...adcom.com>,
Kursad Oney <kursad.oney@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: arm64: bcmbca: Update BCM4908
description
On 21/07/2022 02:06, William Zhang wrote:
> Append "brcm,bcmbca" to BCM4908 chip family compatible strings. Add
> generic 4908 board entry.
This does not explain at all why you are doing it. Improve your commit
messages.
The explanation you gave here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/b8eda882-6838-ab7d-6e2e-131e3125b16f@broadcom.com/
is also not really sufficient (and is not in commit msg). Moving things
around in Linux Kconfig does not justify adding some new compatibles.
To be - clear - this is not a review, so you cannot add Rb tag. If you
insist on a tag, then it as counted as NAK.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists