linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: arm64: bcmbca: Update BCM4908 description

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Jul 2022 08:44:18 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>,
        Linux ARM List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:     joel.peshkin@...adcom.com, dan.beygelman@...adcom.com,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Anand Gore <anand.gore@...adcom.com>,
        Kursad Oney <kursad.oney@...adcom.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
        Broadcom internal kernel review list 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: arm64: bcmbca: Update BCM4908
 description

On 21/07/2022 02:06, William Zhang wrote:
> Append "brcm,bcmbca" to BCM4908 chip family compatible strings. Add
> generic 4908 board entry.

This does not explain at all why you are doing it. Improve your commit
messages.

The explanation you gave here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/b8eda882-6838-ab7d-6e2e-131e3125b16f@broadcom.com/
is also not really sufficient (and is not in commit msg). Moving things
around in Linux Kconfig does not justify adding some new compatibles.

To be - clear - this is not a review, so you cannot add Rb tag. If you
insist on a tag, then it as counted as NAK.

Best regards,
Krzysztof