[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtkA4tBhlSHX76JM@unreal>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 10:31:46 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Cheng Xu <chengyou@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Kai Shen <kaishen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] RDMA/erdma: Use the bitmap API to allocate bitmaps
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 09:58:24AM +0800, Cheng Xu wrote:
>
>
> On 7/19/22 11:36 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > Le 19/07/2022 à 15:01, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
> >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 09:54:34AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 12:01:10PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Best not to use any auto-formatting tools. They are all bad.
> >>>
> >>> Have you tried clang-format? I wouldn't call it bad..
> >>
> >> I prefered Christophe's formatting to clang's. ;)
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> dan carpenter
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > (some other files in the same directory also have some checkpatch warning/error)
>
> I just double checked the checkpatch results, Two type warnings reported:
>
> - WARNING: Missing commit description - Add an appropriate one (for patch 0001)
> - WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? (for almost all patches except 0001/0011)
>
> For the first warning, the change is very simple: add erdma's
> rdma_driver_id definition, I think the commit title can describe
> all things, and is enough.
To be clear, our preference is to have commit message in any case, even
for simple changes.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists