lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 Jul 2022 15:20:32 -0500
From:   Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:     Xin Gao <gaoxin@...rlc.com>, djwong@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Fix comment typo

On 7/22/22 2:43 PM, Xin Gao wrote:
> The double `that' is duplicated in line 575, remove one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xin Gao <gaoxin@...rlc.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> index 82cf0189c0db..d055b0938eb9 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ xfs_trans_apply_sb_deltas(
>   * xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb() is called to release unused reservations and
>   * apply superblock counter changes to the in-core superblock.  The
>   * t_res_fdblocks_delta and t_res_frextents_delta fields are explicitly NOT
> - * applied to the in-core superblock.  The idea is that that has already been
> + * applied to the in-core superblock.  The idea is that has already been
>   * done.
>   *
>   * If we are not logging superblock counters, then the inode allocated/free and

NAK

The comment is correct

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ