linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] mlxsw: use netif_is_any_bridge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Jul 2022 14:17:21 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Juhee Kang <claudiajkang@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, tchornyi@...vell.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, idosch@...dia.com,
        petrm@...dia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] mlxsw: use netif_is_any_bridge_port()
 instead of open code

On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 19:26:47 +0900 Juhee Kang wrote:
> The open code which is netif_is_bridge_port() || netif_is_ovs_port() is
> defined as a new helper function on netdev.h like netif_is_any_bridge_port
> that can check both IFF flags in 1 go. So use netif_is_any_bridge_port()
> function instead of open code. This patch doesn't change logic.

Appears applied:

c497885e3044 ("net: marvell: prestera: use netif_is_any_bridge_port instead of open code")
59ad24714b7b ("mlxsw: use netif_is_any_bridge_port() instead of open code")

Thanks!