[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96552a95-8939-3ac2-c9b3-14dabaf53923@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 19:30:51 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add LLCC BWMON
On 22/07/2022 03:22, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 7/20/22 2:28 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The SDM845 comes with few instances of Bandwidth Monitor. The already
>> supported one monitors traffic between CPU and Last Level Cache
>> Controller (LLCC) and in downstream sources is called BWMON v4 (or v4 of
>> register layout).
>>
>> SDM845 also has also BWMON instance measuring traffic between LLCC and
>> memory with different register layout: called v5.
>>
>> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> index fe14f7e7523b..4aab464e2bd6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> @@ -2053,6 +2053,43 @@ llcc: system-cache-controller@...0000 {
>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 582 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> };
>>
>> + pmu@...a000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-llcc-bwmon";
>> + reg = <0 0x0114a000 0 0x1000>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 580 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + interconnects = <&mem_noc MASTER_LLCC 3 &mem_noc SLAVE_EBI1 3>;
>> +
>> + operating-points-v2 = <&llcc_bwmon_opp_table>;
>> +
>> + llcc_bwmon_opp_table: opp-table {
>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The interconnect path bandwidth taken from
>> + * cpu4_opp_table bandwidth for gladiator_noc-mem_noc
>> + * interconnect. This also matches the
>> + * bandwidth table of qcom,llccbw (qcom,bw-tbl,
>> + * bus width: 4 bytes) from msm-4.9 downstream
>> + * kernel.
>> + */
>> + opp-0 {
>> + opp-peak-kBps = <800000>;
>> + };
>> + opp-1 {
>> + opp-peak-kBps = <1804000>;
>> + };
>> + opp-2 {
>> + opp-peak-kBps = <3072000>;
>> + };
>> + opp-3 {
>> + opp-peak-kBps = <5412000>;
>> + };
>> + opp-4 {
>> + opp-peak-kBps = <7216000>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> pmu@...6400 {
>> compatible = "qcom,sdm845-bwmon", "qcom,msm8998-bwmon";
>> reg = <0 0x01436400 0 0x600>;
>
>
> With this series applied, testing on a Lenovo Yoga C630, which has an
> SDM850, I see the following:
>
> [ 3.673660] qcom-bwmon 114a000.pmu: can't request region for resource
> [mem 0x0114a000-0x0114afff]
> [ 3.673673] qcom-bwmon 114a000.pmu: error -EBUSY: failed to map bwmon
> registers
> [ 3.673678] qcom-bwmon: probe of 114a000.pmu failed with error -16
>
Thanks for the report. What are you running there? `uname -r`? Maybe
your secure world uses it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists