[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d814a6da-b0d7-2fd1-fd14-8f1f3b88666f@kali.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 19:29:21 -0500
From: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add LLCC BWMON
On 7/22/22 12:30 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/07/2022 03:22, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 7/20/22 2:28 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> The SDM845 comes with few instances of Bandwidth Monitor. The already
>>> supported one monitors traffic between CPU and Last Level Cache
>>> Controller (LLCC) and in downstream sources is called BWMON v4 (or v4 of
>>> register layout).
>>>
>>> SDM845 also has also BWMON instance measuring traffic between LLCC and
>>> memory with different register layout: called v5.
>>>
>>> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>> index fe14f7e7523b..4aab464e2bd6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>> @@ -2053,6 +2053,43 @@ llcc: system-cache-controller@...0000 {
>>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 582 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> };
>>>
>>> + pmu@...a000 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-llcc-bwmon";
>>> + reg = <0 0x0114a000 0 0x1000>;
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 580 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> + interconnects = <&mem_noc MASTER_LLCC 3 &mem_noc SLAVE_EBI1 3>;
>>> +
>>> + operating-points-v2 = <&llcc_bwmon_opp_table>;
>>> +
>>> + llcc_bwmon_opp_table: opp-table {
>>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * The interconnect path bandwidth taken from
>>> + * cpu4_opp_table bandwidth for gladiator_noc-mem_noc
>>> + * interconnect. This also matches the
>>> + * bandwidth table of qcom,llccbw (qcom,bw-tbl,
>>> + * bus width: 4 bytes) from msm-4.9 downstream
>>> + * kernel.
>>> + */
>>> + opp-0 {
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <800000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp-1 {
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <1804000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp-2 {
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <3072000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp-3 {
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <5412000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp-4 {
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <7216000>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> pmu@...6400 {
>>> compatible = "qcom,sdm845-bwmon", "qcom,msm8998-bwmon";
>>> reg = <0 0x01436400 0 0x600>;
>>
>> With this series applied, testing on a Lenovo Yoga C630, which has an
>> SDM850, I see the following:
>>
>> [ 3.673660] qcom-bwmon 114a000.pmu: can't request region for resource
>> [mem 0x0114a000-0x0114afff]
>> [ 3.673673] qcom-bwmon 114a000.pmu: error -EBUSY: failed to map bwmon
>> registers
>> [ 3.673678] qcom-bwmon: probe of 114a000.pmu failed with error -16
>>
> Thanks for the report. What are you running there? `uname -r`? Maybe
> your secure world uses it?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Currently it's 5.19.0-rc7 (torvalds tree at 4ba1329c) with a few extra
patches on top, the bwmon set included. It's possible that secure world
uses it, but I do not know enough about that to say one way or the other.
-- steev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists