[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2L4J1Qfu5rw8dvbto25zZDiUrv6vbv-6A6nckgyoRmZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 09:11:39 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Ren Zhijie <renzhijie2@...wei.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..."
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Fix build error
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 9:00 AM Ren Zhijie <renzhijie2@...wei.com> wrote:
> 在 2022/7/25 14:34, Arnd Bergmann 写道:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:38 AM Ren Zhijie <renzhijie2@...wei.com> wrote:
> >> 在 2022/7/13 16:48, Arnd Bergmann 写道:
> >>
> >> I try to use the new marcos SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS and RUNTIME_PM_OPS to
> >> replace the old ones, and remove #ifdef around the declarations in the
> >> header, my local changes attach below.
> >>
> >> But it seems that doesn't work, which has ld errors:
> >>
> >> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
> >> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!
> >> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.o: In function `ufs_mtk_runtime_resume':
> >> ufs-mediatek.c:(.text+0x1d0c): undefined reference to
> >> `ufshcd_runtime_resume'
> >> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.o: In function `ufs_mtk_runtime_suspend':
> >> ufs-mediatek.c:(.text+0x1d64): undefined reference to
> >> `ufshcd_runtime_suspend'
> >> Makefile:1255: recipe for target 'vmlinux' failed
> >> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
> >>
> >> (CONFIG_PM and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP are both not set, and
> >>
> > It appears that there is a mistake in the RUNTIME_PM_OPS()
> > macro definition, can you try this patch on top?
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> I apply this patch and it worked.
>
> When will this patch be merged?
So far nobody has submitted this, I was just guessing and I had no idea
if this would do the right thing. Can you send this patch to the power
management maintainers with a proper changelog and a
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
line? Thanks,
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists