[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <W2JKFR.Y0JWFHU8ZIJU3@crapouillou.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 09:47:20 +0100
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ren Zhijie <renzhijie2@...wei.com>
Cc: stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"ARM/Mediatek SoC..." <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Fix build error
Hi Arnd,
Le lun., juil. 25 2022 at 08:34:32 +0200, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:38 AM Ren Zhijie <renzhijie2@...wei.com>
> wrote:
>> 在 2022/7/13 16:48, Arnd Bergmann 写道:
>>
>> I try to use the new marcos SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS and RUNTIME_PM_OPS
>> to
>> replace the old ones, and remove #ifdef around the declarations in
>> the
>> header, my local changes attach below.
>>
>> But it seems that doesn't work, which has ld errors:
>>
>> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
>> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages
>> detected!
>> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.o: In function
>> `ufs_mtk_runtime_resume':
>> ufs-mediatek.c:(.text+0x1d0c): undefined reference to
>> `ufshcd_runtime_resume'
>> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.o: In function
>> `ufs_mtk_runtime_suspend':
>> ufs-mediatek.c:(.text+0x1d64): undefined reference to
>> `ufshcd_runtime_suspend'
>> Makefile:1255: recipe for target 'vmlinux' failed
>> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
>>
>> (CONFIG_PM and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP are both not set, and
>>
>
> It appears that there is a mistake in the RUNTIME_PM_OPS()
> macro definition, can you try this patch on top?
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
> index 871c9c49ec9d..84592229d754 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm.h
> @@ -334,9 +334,9 @@ struct dev_pm_ops {
> .restore_noirq = pm_sleep_ptr(resume_fn),
>
> #define RUNTIME_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn, idle_fn) \
> - .runtime_suspend = suspend_fn, \
> - .runtime_resume = resume_fn, \
> - .runtime_idle = idle_fn,
> + .runtime_suspend = pm_ptr(suspend_fn), \
> + .runtime_resume = pm_ptr(resume_fn), \
> + .runtime_idle = pm_ptr(idle_fn),
Not a mistake, the pm_ptr() macros are not needed here, because the
dev_pm_ops pointer must always be wrapped with pm_ptr().
The proper fix is:
- .pm = &ufs_mtk_pm_ops,
+ .pm = pm_ptr(&ufs_mtk_pm_ops),
Cheers,
-Paul
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> #define SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn) \
>
> Commit 1a3c7bb08826 ("PM: core: Add new *_PM_OPS macros, deprecate
> old ones") introduced all the macros with the intent of using pm_ptr()
> and pm_sleep_ptr() in them, and I think Paul accidentally forgot to
> add
> those in this instance.
>
> Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists