linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: convert rtw_pwr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220725104027.GO2338@kadam>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jul 2022 13:40:27 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
        paskripkin@...il.com, straube.linux@...il.com, martin@...ser.cx,
        abdun.nihaal@...il.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: convert rtw_pwr_wakeup to correct
 error code semantics

On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 05:30:55PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> Convert the rtw_pwr_wakeup function to use 0 on success and -EPERM on
> error - in all places where we handle this response, we use either -1 or
> -EPERM currently anyway, which are equivalent. Also, for other places
> along the same call chain where we are using -1, use -EPERM.
> 

I can't get behind a change to -EPERM.  Try to pick an appropriate
error code.  I'm not going to be very strict on it, but we have to at
least *try*.

Probably, leave the return -1; lines alone.  Fixing that seems like an
unrelated change.  We need to do this kind of change but I got bitten by
it before so I want to avoid that next time.  My reviews will hopefully
be more careful now.

> This gets the driver closer to removal of the non-standard _SUCCESS and
> _FAIL definitions, which are inverted compared to the standard in-kernel
> error code mechanism.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_p2p.c       |  4 +--
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c   | 10 +++---
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c | 32 ++++++++++----------
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_p2p.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_p2p.c
> index c306aafa183b..bd654d4ff8b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_p2p.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_p2p.c
> @@ -1888,7 +1888,7 @@ int rtw_p2p_enable(struct adapter *padapter, enum P2P_ROLE role)
>  
>  	if (role == P2P_ROLE_DEVICE || role == P2P_ROLE_CLIENT || role == P2P_ROLE_GO) {
>  		/* leave IPS/Autosuspend */
> -		if (rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter) == _FAIL) {
> +		if (rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter)) {
>  			ret = _FAIL;
>  			goto exit;
>  		}

Fine.  The caller now changes from negative error codes to _SUCCESS/_FAIL.
Later we will transition this to normal error codes so we'll update it
to preserve the error code from rtw_pwr_wakeup() at that point.

> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c
> index 930bb4aea435..e0ae0c3c51f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c
> @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int rtw_wx_set_mode(struct net_device *dev, struct iw_request_info *a,
>  
>  
>  
> -	if (_FAIL == rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter)) {
> +	if (rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter)) {
>  		ret = -EPERM;
>  		goto exit;
>  	}

This code is returning negative error codes so it should preserve the
code from rtw_pwr_wakeup().

	ret = rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter);
	if (ret)
		goto exit;

> @@ -933,13 +933,13 @@ static int rtw_wx_set_wap(struct net_device *dev,
>  
>  
>  
> -	if (_FAIL == rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter)) {
> -		ret = -1;
> +	if (rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter)) {
> +		ret = -EPERM;

Same.

>  		goto exit;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!padapter->bup) {
> -		ret = -1;
> +		ret = -EPERM;

Unrelated.

>  		goto exit;
>  	}
>  

[ snip ]

> @@ -1252,13 +1252,13 @@ static int rtw_wx_set_essid(struct net_device *dev,
>  
>  	uint ret = 0, len;
>  
> -	if (_FAIL == rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter)) {
> -		ret = -1;
> +	if (rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter)) {
> +		ret = -EPERM;

Preserve the error code.

>  		goto exit;
>  	}

regards,
dan carpenter