linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8295p: move common nodes to dtsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yt/w5lvPQF2pKlmY@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:49:26 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Parikshit Pareek <quic_ppareek@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8295p: move common nodes to
 dtsi

On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 08:02:32PM +0530, Parikshit Pareek wrote:
> There are many ADP boards with lot of common features. Move common
> nodes to sa8xxxp-auto.dtsi files. This will be base for many ADP boards
> to be introduced in near future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Parikshit Pareek <quic_ppareek@...cinc.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Add , after year 2022, in the license header
> - Rename the dtsi which is suitable for common to many ADP boards
> - Split the patch in introducing common dtsi file, and adding new board
>   file
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8295p-adp.dts      | 378 +----------------
>  .../arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8xxxp-auto-adp.dtsi | 385 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 387 insertions(+), 376 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8xxxp-auto-adp.dtsi

Not sure about the name; sa8540-adp.dtsi seems like a better choice, but
I'd need to know more about how these two relate to each other.

What differs between sa8295p-adp and sa8540p-adp? That should go in the
commit message too.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8295p-adp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8295p-adp.dts
> index 9398f0349944..3cc92162ba02 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8295p-adp.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8295p-adp.dts
> @@ -2,388 +2,14 @@
>  /*
>   * Copyright (c) 2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>   * Copyright (c) 2022, Linaro Limited
> + * Copyright (c) 2022, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.

I'm pretty sure you can't claim copyright for just moving code around
(same for the new file).

>   */

Johan