linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add LLCC BWMON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <68600ea4-9f65-f365-382a-444c60b4a25d@kali.org>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:15:49 -0500
From:   Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>
To:     Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add LLCC BWMON


On 7/26/22 6:31 AM, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> On 7/23/22 2:06 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 23/07/2022 04:37, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Currently it's 5.19.0-rc7 (torvalds tree at 4ba1329c) with a few extra
>>>> patches on top, the bwmon set included.  It's possible that secure
>>>> world uses it, but I do not know enough about that to say one way or
>>>> the other.
>>
>> To test patches you should apply them on maintainer's tree or
>> linux-next. Applying on other trees of course might be useful for
>> testing some backports, but it is independent process and different 
>> issue.
>>
>>>>
>>>> -- steev
>>>>
>>> I think you may be right; I just applied this patchset to -next
>>> (20220722) and i do not see the error message there.  On my 5.19-rc7
>>> tree, i am also testing a patchset that enables qcom devices to access
>>> efivars, so possibly we are ending up in secure world there?
>>
>> Actually mapping of IO space should not touch secure world, so this was
>> a long shot assuming you test it on the next.
>>
>
> The memory region specified in device tree overlaps with the llcc system
> cache controller node. Steev probably had the QCOM_LLCC config enabled 
> when he tested it out on his branch.
>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
Good catch!  You are correct, my -next config did not have QCOM_LLCC 
set, and I am using QCOM_LLCC=m on the 5.19.0 release candidate.