[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YuFvbm/Zck9Tr5pq@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 19:01:34 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
jroedel@...e.de, thomas.lendacky@....com, hpa@...or.com,
ardb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
vkuznets@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, slp@...hat.com, pgonda@...gle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, tobin@....com,
michael.roth@....com, vbabka@...e.cz, kirill@...temov.name,
ak@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, alpergun@...gle.com,
dgilbert@...hat.com, jarkko@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 v6 07/49] x86/sev: Invalid pages from direct map
when adding it to RMP table
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:03:07PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> Subject: x86/sev: Invalid pages from direct map when adding it to RMP table
"...: Invalidate pages from the direct map when adding them to the RMP table"
> +static int restore_direct_map(u64 pfn, int npages)
> +{
> + int i, ret = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) {
> + ret = set_direct_map_default_noflush(pfn_to_page(pfn + i));
set_memory_p() ?
> + if (ret)
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> +cleanup:
> + WARN(ret > 0, "Failed to restore direct map for pfn 0x%llx\n", pfn + i);
Warn for each pfn?!
That'll flood dmesg mightily.
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int invalid_direct_map(unsigned long pfn, int npages)
> +{
> + int i, ret = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) {
> + ret = set_direct_map_invalid_noflush(pfn_to_page(pfn + i));
As above, set_memory_np() doesn't work here instead of looping over each
page?
> @@ -2462,11 +2494,38 @@ static int rmpupdate(u64 pfn, struct rmpupdate *val)
> if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP))
> return -ENXIO;
>
> + level = RMP_TO_X86_PG_LEVEL(val->pagesize);
> + npages = page_level_size(level) / PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> + /*
> + * If page is getting assigned in the RMP table then unmap it from the
> + * direct map.
> + */
> + if (val->assigned) {
> + if (invalid_direct_map(pfn, npages)) {
> + pr_err("Failed to unmap pfn 0x%llx pages %d from direct_map\n",
"Failed to unmap %d pages at pfn 0x... from the direct map\n"
> + pfn, npages);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> + }
> +
> /* Binutils version 2.36 supports the RMPUPDATE mnemonic. */
> asm volatile(".byte 0xF2, 0x0F, 0x01, 0xFE"
> : "=a"(ret)
> : "a"(paddr), "c"((unsigned long)val)
> : "memory", "cc");
> +
> + /*
> + * Restore the direct map after the page is removed from the RMP table.
> + */
> + if (!ret && !val->assigned) {
> + if (restore_direct_map(pfn, npages)) {
> + pr_err("Failed to map pfn 0x%llx pages %d in direct_map\n",
"Failed to map %d pages at pfn 0x... into the direct map\n"
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists