linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH Part2 v6 06/49] x86/sev: Add helper functions for RMPUPDATE and PSMASH instruction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yt6qit4al5/eM7YO@zn.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:36:58 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@....com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        jroedel@...e.de, thomas.lendacky@....com, hpa@...or.com,
        ardb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, slp@...hat.com, pgonda@...gle.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
        rientjes@...gle.com, dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, tobin@....com,
        michael.roth@....com, vbabka@...e.cz, kirill@...temov.name,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, alpergun@...gle.com,
        dgilbert@...hat.com, jarkko@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 v6 06/49] x86/sev: Add helper functions for
 RMPUPDATE and PSMASH instruction

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:02:52PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> index cb16f0e5b585..6ab872311544 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> @@ -85,7 +85,9 @@ extern bool handle_vc_boot_ghcb(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  
>  /* RMP page size */
>  #define RMP_PG_SIZE_4K			0
> +#define RMP_PG_SIZE_2M			1
>  #define RMP_TO_X86_PG_LEVEL(level)	(((level) == RMP_PG_SIZE_4K) ? PG_LEVEL_4K : PG_LEVEL_2M)
> +#define X86_TO_RMP_PG_LEVEL(level)	(((level) == PG_LEVEL_4K) ? RMP_PG_SIZE_4K : RMP_PG_SIZE_2M)
>  
>  /*
>   * The RMP entry format is not architectural. The format is defined in PPR
> @@ -126,6 +128,15 @@ struct snp_guest_platform_data {
>  	u64 secrets_gpa;
>  };
>  
> +struct rmpupdate {

Why is there a struct rmpupdate *and* a struct rmpentry?!

One should be enough.

> +	u64 gpa;
> +	u8 assigned;
> +	u8 pagesize;
> +	u8 immutable;
> +	u8 rsvd;
> +	u32 asid;
> +} __packed;
> +

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette