[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <372e37bf-ac90-c371-ad9e-b9c18e1cc059@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 14:07:50 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: Add optional DT property
riscv,timer-can-wake-cpu
On 27/07/2022 13:43, Anup Patel wrote:
> We add an optional DT property riscv,timer-can-wake-cpu which if present
> in CPU DT node then CPU timer is always powered-on and never loses context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> index d632ac76532e..b60b64b4113a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> @@ -78,6 +78,12 @@ properties:
> - rv64imac
> - rv64imafdc
>
> + riscv,timer-can-wake-cpu:
> + type: boolean
> + description:
> + If present, the timer interrupt can wake up the CPU from
> + suspend/idle state.
Isn't this a property of a timer, not CPU? IOW, your timer node should
have "wakeup-source" property.
Now that's actual problem: why the RISC-V timer is bound to "riscv"
compatible, not to dedicated timer node? How is it related to actual CPU
(not SoC)?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists